nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Josh Luthman <josh () imaginenetworksllc com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 11:39:47 -0400
Well, my dsl provider has like a 25/5 50/10 so clearly everybody has the
headroom to get to 10 at least.
I mean, most users have no clue about such things.
Lol I'm sure you're no network operator Michael. That's not accurate (well your first statement). On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 8:29 PM Mike Hammett <nanog () ics-il net> wrote:
It's not always something the service provider has the ability to change. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> ------------------------------ *From: *"Michael Thomas" <mike () mtcc com> *To: *"Mike Hammett" <nanog () ics-il net> *Cc: *nanog () nanog org *Sent: *Saturday, June 11, 2022 2:38:29 PM *Subject: *Re: Upstream bandwidth usage On 6/10/22 6:52 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: Due to the demand being predominately in the downward direction, half-duplex (or effectively half-duplex) systems either allocate more TDMA slots or more channels to downstream, at the expense of upstream. Well, my dsl provider has like a 25/5 50/10 so clearly everybody has the headroom to get to 10 at least. Marketing, of course, but I wonder how many support calls they got because "my internet is slow" from saturated upstream with zoom calls. I mean, most users have no clue about such things. Mike ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com ------------------------------ *From: *"Michael Thomas" <mike () mtcc com> <mike () mtcc com> *To: *nanog () nanog org *Sent: *Thursday, June 9, 2022 3:46:24 PM *Subject: *Re: Upstream bandwidth usage On 6/9/22 1:26 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:With 430 GB versus 32 GV average down versus up usage today, according to your article, this is still not a case for symmetrical consumer bandwidth. Yes, the upstream usage increased slightly more than the downstream usage. But the ratio was still so big that it would take decades for them to join. I doubt they ever will. Consumers just don’t have that much days up to push yet, and probably never will. Also, a lot of that Usage can be explained by video conferencing during Covid, which has dropped off significantly already.If it's so tiny, why shape it aggressively? Why shouldn't I be able to burst to whatever is available at the moment? I would think most users would be happy with that. Mike
Current thread:
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage, (continued)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Niels Bakker (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Masataka Ohta (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Josh Luthman (Jun 12)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Raymond Burkholder (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Brandon Jackson (Jun 09)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Vasilenko Eduard via NANOG (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Dave Bell (Jun 10)