nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Mel Beckman <mel () beckman org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2022 21:53:11 +0000
Because to maximize bandwith efficiency, ISPs, me included, sell that unused upstream bandwidth for website hosting and video streaming. -mel via cell
On Jun 9, 2022, at 1:47 PM, Michael Thomas <mike () mtcc com> wrote: On 6/9/22 1:26 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: With 430 GB versus 32 GV average down versus up usage today, according to your article, this is still not a case for symmetrical consumer bandwidth. Yes, the upstream usage increased slightly more than the downstream usage. But the ratio was still so big that it would take decades for them to join. I doubt they ever will. Consumers just don’t have that much days up to push yet, and probably never will. Also, a lot of that Usage can be explained by video conferencing during Covid, which has dropped off significantly already.If it's so tiny, why shape it aggressively? Why shouldn't I be able to burst to whatever is available at the moment? I would think most users would be happy with that. Mike
Current thread:
- Upstream bandwidth usage Fletcher Kittredge (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Niels Bakker (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Masataka Ohta (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Josh Luthman (Jun 12)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)