nanog mailing list archives
Re: Upstream bandwidth usage
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta () necom830 hpcl titech ac jp>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 22:45:58 +0900
Michael Thomas wrote:
If it's so tiny, why shape it aggressively? Why shouldn't I be able to burst to whatever is available at the moment? I would think most users would be happy with that.
Seemingly, to distinguish inexpensive economy and expensive business class services. Masataka Ohta
Current thread:
- Upstream bandwidth usage Fletcher Kittredge (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Niels Bakker (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- RE: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mark Tinka (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Masataka Ohta (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 10)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mike Hammett (Jun 11)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Josh Luthman (Jun 12)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Mel Beckman (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Adam Thompson (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Michael Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Upstream bandwidth usage Raymond Burkholder (Jun 09)