nanog mailing list archives
RE: BGP Experiment
From: "Naslund, Steve" <SNaslund () medline com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:54:50 +0000
I hope you are as critical of your hardware vendor that cannot accept BGP4 compliant attributes or have you just not updated your code? You can black hole anything you want but as long as the “Internet” is sending you an RFC compliant BGP you better be able to handle it. Steven Naslund Chicago IL On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:00 PM Ben Cooper <ben () packet gg<mailto:ben () packet gg>> wrote: Can you stop this? You caused again a massive prefix spike/flap, and as the internet is not centered around NA (shock horror!) a number of operators in Asia and Australia go effected by your “expirment” and had no idea what was happening or why. Get a sandbox like every other researcher, as of now we have black holed and filtered your whole ASN, and have reccomended others do the same.
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 10)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 22)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Job Snijders (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Aled Morris via NANOG (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)