nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 21:00:19 +0300
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 12:00 PM Ben Cooper <ben () packet gg> wrote: You caused again a massive prefix spike/flap, and as the internet is not centered around NA (shock horror!) a number of operators in Asia and Australia go effected by your “expirment” and had no idea what was happening or why. Get a sandbox like every other researcher
The whole thing reminds me of a decades old story which can be found on Google by a search term "The Spider of Doom". What if next time e.g. the bad guys would be doing this? Would you urge them to also get a sandbox? -- Töma
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 22)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Job Snijders (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Aled Morris via NANOG (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 22)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nikolas Geyer (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment James Jun (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Mark Tinka (Jan 23)