nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Aled Morris via NANOG <nanog () nanog org>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:01:45 +0000
On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 at 17:58, Naslund, Steve <SNaslund () medline com> wrote:
I hope you are as critical of your hardware vendor that cannot accept BGP4 compliant attributes or have you just not updated your code? You can black hole anything you want but as long as the “Internet” is sending you an RFC compliant BGP you better be able to handle it.
I'd go further and say that as long as you're connected to the Internet, your equipment better be resilient when receiving packets with any combination of bits set, RFC compliant or not. Aled
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 10)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 22)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Job Snijders (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Aled Morris via NANOG (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Nick Hilliard (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Filip Hruska (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment William Herrin (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Christoffer Hansen (Jan 23)