nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP Experiment
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 22:53:35 +0300
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:33 PM Owen DeLong <owen () delong com> wrote:
Fair enough, but the frequency of vulnerability announcements even in some of the best implementations is still more often than I think my customers will tolerated reboots.
Well, and when I think about it for the second time, I can't help pointing out that there are long lived efforts from OS developers to come up with live patching, especially embedded and RTOS developers. As the recent you-know-which downtime has shown us, there are Internet-based services like 911 telephony which really start to treat Internet as a whole as a real time system. The question here is whether this encourages e.g. the aforementioned FRR developers (along with device vendors who actually get paid for the uninterruptible BGP availability) to accept this challenge. -- Töma
Current thread:
- Re: BGP Experiment, (continued)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Saku Ytti (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- RE: BGP Experiment adamv0025 (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Owen DeLong (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 09)
- Re: BGP Experiment Ben Cooper (Jan 24)
- Re: BGP Experiment Italo Cunha (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Job Snijders (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Eric Kuhnke (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Aled Morris via NANOG (Jan 23)
- Re: BGP Experiment Töma Gavrichenkov (Jan 23)
- RE: BGP Experiment Naslund, Steve (Jan 23)