nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation
From: excelsio () gmx com
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2014 20:45:50 +0100
That´s actually a topic, I was thinking ago some time ago. Why not take a current TOR switch with 1. BGP support and 2. high buffer. Like mentioned above we have Trident 2 bases switches. HP (no recommendation) has its HP 5930 series but tells "Routing table size 16000 entries (IPv4), 8000 entries (IPv6)", but this one has 4GB RAM, so plenty of space for full tables. I haven´t tried it out myself, perhaps someone tried on any other device: What will happen, if I give the switch a full table? Is there a software limit by the vendor, which will simply cut everything above? Or would it simply work? Michael
Current thread:
- 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation randal k (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Adrian Minta (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nitzan Tzelniker (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Randy Bush (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 07)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Adrian Minta (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation joel jaeggli (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Zoran Perovic (Jan 07)