nanog mailing list archives
10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation
From: randal k <nanog () data102 com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 10:57:06 -0700
Good morning, We're in the market to move our IX peering off of our core (too much BGP/CPU :-/ ) and onto a dedicated switch. Anybody have a recommendation on a switch that can do the following without costing a fortune? I have scoured Cisco, and bang for the buck is ... ASR9k (way over powered for handling zero-feature IX traffic), 3-8x 10gbps ports 64k routes minimum, preferably 128k Must be able to speak BGP Native/functional IPv6 would be sharp! Basic QoS to police our ports The prefix count seems to be the killer, as our exchange table is getting pretty big (42k+ currently). I'm really tempted to build a vyatta box or similar, but would rather do something off the shelf -- especially if it can be 1-2 gens old and cost effective. I'm certain that this same situation is scratching many other folks as exchanges become more important. Thanks for your input in advance -- stay warm! Randal
Current thread:
- 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation randal k (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Adrian Minta (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nitzan Tzelniker (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Randy Bush (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 07)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Adrian Minta (Jan 06)