nanog mailing list archives
Re: Open source hardware
From: Saku Ytti <saku () ytti fi>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2014 21:50:52 +0200
On (2014-01-08 13:56 -0500), Ray Soucy wrote:
Just to toss in a few more vendors so not to look biased:
Instead of suggesting names, I'm giving some suggestions want to ask for vendor when looking for new partner - DDM/DOM, should be included in each (<1USD price premium), min/max TX/RX in eeprom should match that of PDF specsheet - accountability - supplier knows what they've sold to you, and where they've sourced them, so if there is problem, they can easily state you which of your optics are affected - replacement - advance replacement for non-critical replacement - eeprommer - usable by field-tech without training. If they are 'x compatible' it only means that someone programmed the eeprom with 'x' data. That someone might as well be your field tech, as it reduces your spare cost and ensures you always have correct part. Verify software has codes for kit you need it for. - if you need part (like for example dwdm) when 1st party only support something like SR, make sure you get the eeprom saying something that still allows you to inventory it correctly for easing operations when it needs to be replaced - part numbers - product ordered with given partnumber should be same part, single source laser, microcontroller, casing etc. If some source/supplier is changed, part number is changed. (So you can rely on getting something you know to work, to avoid testing everything) - product change notification - if something is changed with 'compatible' part without part number change, you should be informed of what was changed and why - prices decrease rapidly, it's chore to keep renegotiating constantly, try to negotiate contract where your price changes in reflection to vendors supplies becoming cheaper And of course make sure they sell all the stuff you need, so you don't need to have many sources, fewer sources, larger volume, better prices and also less parts to track/test. Chances are if you're just using 1st party, there may be lot of interesting optics available which will allow you to engineer some problems lot cheaper than you've used to.
When all is said and done, my experience with third-party optics has been that they're identical to brand-name optics except for the sticker. In fact, it's pretty clear most of the time that they're often made by the same place.
-- ++ytti
Current thread:
- Re: Open source hardware, (continued)
- Re: Open source hardware Ray Soucy (Jan 03)
- RE: Open source hardware Raymond Burkholder (Jan 03)
- Re: Open source hardware Saku Ytti (Jan 03)
- Re: Open source hardware Benno Overeinder (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Saku Ytti (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Nick Hilliard (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Mark Tinka (Jan 04)
- Re: Open source hardware Vlade Ristevski (Jan 07)
- Re: Open source hardware Ray Soucy (Jan 07)
- Re: Open source hardware Ray Soucy (Jan 08)
- Re: Open source hardware Saku Ytti (Jan 08)
- Re: Open source hardware Brandon Ross (Jan 08)
- Re: Open source hardware Saku Ytti (Jan 09)
- Re: Open source hardware Aled Morris (Jan 07)
- Re: Open source hardware Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: Open source hardware Thomas Nadeau (Jan 03)