nanog mailing list archives
Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation
From: Nick Hilliard <nick () foobar org>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:47:45 +0000
On 06/01/2014 19:43, Mark Tinka wrote:
FIB space requirements in a switch are also going to limit your options.
it's the merchant silicon boxes which are driving high density 10g prices down, but most of these boxes tends to come with small fibs and tiny buffers which limits their deployment usefulness. Still, if they work for your requirements, they are completely awesome. Nick
Current thread:
- 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation randal k (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Adrian Minta (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nitzan Tzelniker (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Randy Bush (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Nick Hilliard (Jan 07)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Adrian Minta (Jan 06)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation joel jaeggli (Jan 08)
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Mark Tinka (Jan 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: 10gbps peering subscriber switch recommendation Zoran Perovic (Jan 07)