nanog mailing list archives
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: Darren Pilgrim <nanog () bitfreak org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:29:17 -0700
On 9/26/2013 1:52 AM, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...
The foundation of that, though, was ignorance of address space exhaustion. IPv4's address space was too small for such large thinking. IPv6 is far beyond enough to use such allocation policies.
Current thread:
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size, (continued)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Bryan Socha (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Måns Nilsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 25)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Patrick (Sep 26)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Azinger, Marla (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Message not available
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ryan McIntosh (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Brandon Ross (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Joe Abley (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Carpenter (Sep 27)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 24)