nanog mailing list archives
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike () swm pp se>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 05:25:14 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 25 Sep 2013, Nathanael C. Cariaga wrote:
doing multi-homing and having a /48 in each site would be very big waste of IP resources.
IPv6 was designed with an expectation of having /48 per geographical site and this is perfectly fine.
I have a /48 at home.What is more of a concern is to do aggregation in the DFZ, if every size got itself a /48 PI and announced it in the DFZ then the routing system would not be very happy...
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike () swm pp se
Current thread:
- minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ben (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Edward Dore (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Bryan Socha (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Måns Nilsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 25)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Patrick (Sep 26)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Azinger, Marla (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size William Herrin (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 24)