nanog mailing list archives
Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size
From: "Nathanael C. Cariaga" <nccariaga () stluke com ph>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 11:10:52 +0800
Hi, I raised actually this concern during our IP resource application.On a personal note, I think /48 IPv6 allocation is more than enough for our organization to use for at least the next 5-10 years assuming that this can be farmed out to our multiple sites. What makes this complicated for us is that we are operating on a multiple sites (geographically) with each site is doing multi-homing and having a /48 in each site would be very big waste of IP resources.
-nathan On 9/25/2013 2:36 AM, Bryan Socha wrote:
Everyone is following the same policies. a /48 PER SITE. did you request enough addresses from your RIR? Bryan Socha
Current thread:
- minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Ben (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Randy Bush (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Edward Dore (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Bryan Socha (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Nathanael C. Cariaga (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Mikael Abrahamsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Måns Nilsson (Sep 24)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Owen DeLong (Sep 25)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size bmanning (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Patrick (Sep 26)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Azinger, Marla (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size joel jaeggli (Sep 26)
- Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Darren Pilgrim (Sep 26)
- RE: minimum IPv6 announcement size Otis L. Surratt, Jr. (Sep 24)