nanog mailing list archives
Re: Radware vs Arbor
From: Beavis <pfunix () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:57:42 -0600
For a DDoS solution; my experience leans on arbor's peakflow and their partnership with other upstream carrier's (Level3, Peer1, etc.) which makes sense since most of the attacks are distributed having recon work done by an organization like arbor makes you only worry about the attack types that come into your network and not much the top part complexities of it. I am in no relationship with arbor or any of it's employees. this is solely based on my knowledge of the product. regards, -Beavis On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Tempest <tempestterror () gmail com> wrote:
Doing a bunch of research, and I can't find a meaningful comparison of these two products. Work for a carrier, and I am looking at implementing a DDoS mitigation service that we can sell to our customers. Radware is cheaper, but I am seeing a lot of noise in various forums that makes me question their viability for what we need. Arbor has most of the market, and I assume there is good reason for it. Both companies seem to be very deceptive about how they compare to the other. Anyone out there with good hands on experience that can compare? Not interested in input from either company, we get plenty of that already. Good experience, or links to good write ups would be excellent... Davis B.
-- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments Disclaimer: http://goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
Current thread:
- Radware vs Arbor Tempest (Sep 26)
- Re: Radware vs Arbor Beavis (Sep 26)
- Re: Radware vs Arbor dennis (Sep 26)
- Re: Radware vs Arbor Fabien Delmotte (Sep 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Radware vs Arbor Steve (Sep 27)
- Re: Radware vs Arbor Beavis (Sep 26)