nanog mailing list archives

Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size


From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () besserwisser org>
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 07:52:16 +0200

Subject: Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size Date: Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 11:10:52AM +0800 Quoting Nathanael C. Cariaga 
(nccariaga () stluke com ph):
Hi,

I raised actually this concern during our IP resource application.

On a personal note, I think /48 IPv6 allocation is more than enough
for our organization to use for at least the next 5-10 years
assuming that this can be farmed out to our multiple sites. What
makes this complicated for us is that we are operating on a multiple
sites (geographically) with each site is doing multi-homing and
having a /48 in each site would be very big waste of IP resources.

If you've got island networks w/o links between you SHOULD request a /48 per site. 

-- 
Måns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
Pardon me, but do you know what it means to be TRULY ONE with your BOOTH!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Current thread: