nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
From: Mark Smith <nanog () 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc nosense org>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:42:31 +1030
On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:48:52 -0600 Tom Ammon <tom.ammon () utah edu> wrote:
RFC1918 is a good place to start ;)
Most of the issues in "Deprecating Site Local Addresses" http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3879.txt identified in IPv6 Site-Local addressing also apply to duplicated/overlapping IPv4 addressing.
On 3/18/2010 10:22 AM, Jaren Angerbauer wrote:Thanks all for the on / off list responses on this. I acknowledge I'm playing in territory I'm not familiar with, and was a bad idea to jump to the conclusion that this range was private. I made that assumption originally because the entire /8 was owned by APNIC, and just figured since the registrar owned them, it must have been a private range. :S It sounds like this range was just recently assigned -- is there any document (RFC?) or source I could look through to learn more about this, and/or provide evidence to my client? Thanks, Jaren-- -------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Ammon Network Engineer Office: 801.587.0976 Mobile: 801.674.9273 Center for High Performance Computing University of Utah http://www.chpc.utah.edu
Current thread:
- Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Michael Holstein (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Tom Ammon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Mark Smith (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Joel Jaeggli (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jonathan Lassoff (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Cian Brennan (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jared Mauch (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US William Allen Simpson (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Matt Shadbolt (Mar 18)