nanog mailing list archives

Re: Using private APNIC range in US


From: Matt Shadbolt <matt.shadbolt () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:04:52 +1100

I once had a customer who for some reason had all their printers on public
addresses they didn't own. Not advertising them outside, but internally
whenever a user browsed to a external site that happened to be one of the
addresses used, they would just receive a HP or Konica login page :)

They didn't mind though. No idea if they've changed it since.


On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net> wrote:

On 3/18/2010 14:30, William Allen Simpson wrote:
On 3/18/10 2:35 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Does anyone know if the University of Michigan or Cisco are going be
updating their systems and documentation to no longer use 1.2.3.4 ?

http://www.google.com/search?q=1.2.3.4+site%3Acisco.com

I know that the University of Michigan utilize 1.2.3.4 for their captive
portal login/logout pages as recently as monday when I was on the medical
campus.

Dunno about cisco.

med.umich.edu seems to run their own stuff, separately from umich.edu,
and
quite badly.  I've complained about their setup repeatedly over the past
several years.  No traction.

Is it something about Medical Schools?

When we were first putting together the campus network, Surgery was
running a Token Ring (I thought "Vampire Tap" was a fitting item for
their inventory) running in Class D space as I recall.

Should we try again, jointly?  ;-)

Towards the end, there were people who insisted I must rout their net to
the Internets.

I declined.
--
Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.
(A republic, using parliamentary law, protects the minority.)

Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca

ICBM Targeting Information:  http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml






Current thread: