nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:12:07 -0700
1.0.0.0/8 is NOT private address space and never was. It was an arbitrary mis-use by your customer of space which is now part of the APNIC pool of addresses to issue in response to requests for new globally unique addresses. The result for your customer is that they've gotten away with treating it like RFC-1918 space (10/8, 172.16/12, 192.168/16) so far because there was no legitimate external use of that address. RFC-1918 in ARIN is the same as everywhere else. There is no region- specific aspect of it. What will happen if your customer does not renumber out of 1/8 is that there will be a portion of the internet rightfully using 1/8 that will be unreachable from your customer's internal systems and any requests to those legitimate hosts in 1/8 will be erroneously routed within your customer's premises. There are other possible issues if your cusotmer leaks DNS entries containing A records pointed towards 1/8 hosts as well. Hope that helps. Owen On Mar 18, 2010, at 8:52 AM, Jaren Angerbauer wrote:
Hi all, I have a client here in the US, that I just discovered is using a host of private IPs that (as I understand) belong to APNIC (i.e. 1.7.154.70, 1.7.154.00-99, etc.) for their web servers. I'm assuming that the addresses probably nat to a [US] public IP. I'm not familiar enough with the use of private address space outside of ARIN (i.e. 192.0.0.0, 10.0.0.0, etc) but I figure if their sites are up and accessible it must be working for them. I'm just wondering if there is any recommendation or practice around this -- using private IP ranges from another country. Thanks. --Jaren
Current thread:
- Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Michael Holstein (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Tom Ammon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Mark Smith (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Joel Jaeggli (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jonathan Lassoff (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Cian Brennan (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)