nanog mailing list archives
Re: Using private APNIC range in US
From: Larry Sheldon <LarrySheldon () cox net>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:30:55 -0500
On 3/18/2010 11:22, Jaren Angerbauer wrote:
It sounds like this range was just recently assigned -- is there any document (RFC?) or source I could look through to learn more about this, and/or provide evidence to my client?
See related traffic on this list, for openers. -- Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu. (A republic, using parliamentary law, protects the minority.) Requiescas in pace o email Ex turpi causa non oritur actio Eppure si rinfresca ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
Current thread:
- Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Michael Holstein (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Larry Sheldon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Tom Ammon (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Mark Smith (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Joel Jaeggli (Mar 21)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jaren Angerbauer (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jonathan Lassoff (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Cian Brennan (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Owen DeLong (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US Jared Mauch (Mar 18)
- Re: Using private APNIC range in US William Allen Simpson (Mar 18)