nanog mailing list archives
Re: Redundant AS's
From: "James R. Cutler" <james.cutler () consultant com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:33:23 -0400
What this quote means is that it is 65536 times more cost-effective to deploy 4 byte ASN than to mess with legacy assignments.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 12:50 PM, Heather Schiller wrote:
I tend to agree w/ Randy.. it's time and money better spent focusing our efforts on supporting 4byte ASN (and v6 for that matter) Attempts at recovering 2byte ASN's (and v4 space..) are short term solutions, at best extend the 'free pool' for a short and unpredictable period of time, while incurring more headache, expense, and arguing, than working toward supporting the inevitable.
James R. Cutler james.cutler () consultant com
Current thread:
- Redundant AS's Simon Brilus (Mar 17)
- Re: Redundant AS's tvest (Mar 17)
- Re: Redundant AS's Henk Uijterwaal (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Hank Nussbacher (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Heather Schiller (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's goemon (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Hank Nussbacher (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Florian Weimer (Mar 20)
- Re: Redundant AS's Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: Redundant AS's Heather Schiller (Mar 20)
- Re: Redundant AS's James R. Cutler (Mar 20)
- Re: Redundant AS's Hank Nussbacher (Mar 21)
- Re: Redundant AS's Florian Weimer (Mar 21)
- Re: Redundant AS's Henk Uijterwaal (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Randy Bush (Mar 21)
- Re: Redundant AS's Florian Weimer (Mar 21)
- Re: Redundant AS's bmanning (Mar 21)
- Re: Redundant AS's Nick Hilliard (Mar 22)
- Re: Redundant AS's Alex H. Ryu (Mar 22)
- Re: Redundant AS's bmanning (Mar 22)
- Re: Redundant AS's Robert E. Seastrom (Mar 22)
- Re: Redundant AS's Lyndon Nerenberg (Mar 22)
- Re: Redundant AS's tvest (Mar 17)