nanog mailing list archives
Re: Redundant AS's
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () efes iucc ac il>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:07:20 +0200
At 08:18 AM 18-03-09 +0100, Henk Uijterwaal wrote:
It's a bit dated now, but the RIPE report, ASN MIA, sounds like what you're looking for... www.apnic.net/meetings/21/docs/sigs/routing/routing-pres-uijterwaal-asn-mia.pptWhen I look at this more recently, the conclusion still seems to be valid: we'll run out of 16 bit ASN's somewhere in 2011 to 2013. There are a lot of unused ASN's out there. Recovering them will postpone the problem by a few years but it won't solve it. The basic problem with recovery is how to decide if an ASN is really no longer used/needed. There is (still) no mechanism to do this. Henk
Why not go after low lying fruit first? If an ASN was assigned years ago and hasn't appeared in the RIB for the past year that ASN should be reclaimed. Send warning emails to the registered contacts as well as to the assigning LIR and after 3 months - just reclaim it.
-Hank
Current thread:
- Redundant AS's Simon Brilus (Mar 17)
- Re: Redundant AS's tvest (Mar 17)
- Re: Redundant AS's Henk Uijterwaal (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Hank Nussbacher (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Heather Schiller (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's goemon (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Hank Nussbacher (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Florian Weimer (Mar 20)
- Re: Redundant AS's Hank Nussbacher (Mar 20)
- Re: Redundant AS's Heather Schiller (Mar 20)
- Re: Redundant AS's James R. Cutler (Mar 20)
- Re: Redundant AS's Hank Nussbacher (Mar 21)
- Re: Redundant AS's Florian Weimer (Mar 21)
- Re: Redundant AS's Henk Uijterwaal (Mar 18)
- Re: Redundant AS's Randy Bush (Mar 21)
- Re: Redundant AS's tvest (Mar 17)