nanog mailing list archives

Re: Redundant AS's


From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:03:16 -0400


bmanning () vacation karoshi com writes:

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:56:06PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 21/03/2009 16:36, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:
   er... 'parm me sir, but aren't -all- ASNs 4 bytes?

   i mean, for lo these many years we cheated and only
   used the first two bytes...  but the spec always
   called out four bytes.

There seems to be a bug in my router:

router(config)#router bgp 196641
                              ^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.

router(config)#

Do you know of anyone I could call who can fix this?

Nick


      your using the wrong protocol.. :)
      or the wrong version of a vendors code.
      try EGP and you should be fine w/ 4byte ASNs.

rfc 827, page 3:

   Autonomous systems will be  assigned  16-bit  identification
   numbers  (in  much  the same ways as network and protocol numbers
   are now assigned), and every EGP message header contains one word
   for  this  number.  

-r



Current thread: