nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hurricane Electric
From: David Klann <klann () wins net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:29:24 -0500
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:41:23 -0500 Paul Stewart <pstewart () nexicomgroup net> wrote:
Looking for some feedback on using Hurricane Electric as an upstream?
Hi Paul, My employer, Airstream Communications, uses HE for one of its three upstream Internet providers. We have an asymmetric 1GB inbound, and 512MB outbound connection with them. I'm not involved in the financial side of things, but from a technical perspective we've had an excellent relationship with them. Rock solid connection, and helpful technical support. One of our customers, and our DNS server were the subjects of a DDoS attack a few months ago. While our other upstream providers were trying to find the official process for helping us out, HE had already null routed the destination IP addresses for us. They were also very easy to work with in getting the service restored to those addresses. -David Klann Airstream Communications
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- Re: Cogent input Seth Mattinen (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input Dan Carley (Jun 17)
- Re: Cogent input Brad Fleming (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Tore Anderson (Jun 11)
- RE: Cogent input Alex Rubenstein (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- Re: Cogent input Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 15)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- Re: Cogent input Martin Hannigan (Jun 12)
- Re: Cogent input Stef Walter (Jun 15)
- Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric David Klann (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Paul Ferguson (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Tico (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric bmanning (Jun 18)
- RE: Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 18)
- Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)