nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hurricane Electric
From: Steve Bertrand <steve () ibctech ca>
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:34:11 -0400
Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi folks... Looking for some feedback on using Hurricane Electric as an upstream?
Even though I only have tunnel relationships with them for v6 (ie free transit), I'd have to say that between: - their excellent automation tools - their time-to-response - their level of connectivity - their observance of this (and other) list(s) - their clueful staff ...would provide me with incentive to buy transit from them, if I were in a position to make such a decision. (Without hesitation). Steve
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- Re: Cogent input Tore Anderson (Jun 11)
- RE: Cogent input Alex Rubenstein (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- Re: Cogent input Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 15)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- Re: Cogent input Martin Hannigan (Jun 12)
- Re: Cogent input Stef Walter (Jun 15)
- Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric David Klann (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Paul Ferguson (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Tico (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric bmanning (Jun 18)
- RE: Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 18)
- Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)