nanog mailing list archives
Re: Hurricane Electric
From: Tico <tico-nanog () raapid net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:59:50 -0500
Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi folks...Looking for some feedback on using Hurricane Electric as an upstream?
I'll second what others have already said.I've interacted with them a decent bit, and have always gotten prompt, knowledgeable, and helpful support and service when I've called/emailed. They've got simple, consistent, and reliable service, though they don't deviate much from what they've standardized on which is most likely the main reason they can offer the pricing that they do.
So far, they hold the rare title of being the *only* transit provider that I've used that has never pissed me off. Plus they're IPv6 native across the board, if you care about that sort of thing.
Cheers, Tico
Thanks, Paul---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and then destroy this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. Thank you."
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent input, (continued)
- Re: Cogent input Brad Fleming (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input Tore Anderson (Jun 11)
- RE: Cogent input Alex Rubenstein (Jun 11)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- Re: Cogent input Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 15)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- Re: Cogent input Martin Hannigan (Jun 12)
- Re: Cogent input Stef Walter (Jun 15)
- Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric David Klann (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Paul Ferguson (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Tico (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric bmanning (Jun 18)
- RE: Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 18)
- Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)