nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cogent input
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () corp nac net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:18:40 -0400
I'm aware of some (regular?) depeering issues. The NANOG archives have
AFAIR, there has never been a black-holing, just disappearance of routes. If you are properly multihomed, this is irrelevant and you continue to eat your ice cream and chuckle while they fight it out. It's amusing, really.
I also know that their bandwidth is extremely cheap. This of course creates an issue for technical folks when trying to justify other upstream options that cost significantly more but also don't have a damaging history of getting depeered.
It's not as relatively cheap as it used to be. A variety of others can be had in the same ballpark (Telia, Tiscali, Seabone, etc.)
Current thread:
- IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input), (continued)
- IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Jeroen Massar (Jun 14)
- Re: IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Robert Blayzor (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv6 transits (Was: Cogent input) Nuno Vieira - nfsi telecom (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv6 transits sthaug (Jun 18)
- Re: IPv6 transits Tomas Caslavsky (Jun 18)
- Re: Cogent input Justin Shore (Jun 12)
- Re: Cogent input Seth Mattinen (Jun 16)
- Re: Cogent input Dan Carley (Jun 17)
- Re: Cogent input German Martinez (Jun 14)
- Re: Cogent input Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 15)
- Hurricane Electric Paul Stewart (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric David Klann (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Paul Ferguson (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Tico (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric Steve Bertrand (Jun 17)
- Re: Hurricane Electric bmanning (Jun 18)