nanog mailing list archives
Re: Collocation Access
From: Roland Perry <lists () internetpolicyagency com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:46:09 +0100
In article <9FA71E73BF462E4C96C3A9C074D50F7093BDE5 () DHOST001-39 DEX001 intermedia net
>, Craig Holland <cholland () rnmd net> writes
The fellow I chatted with at AT&T said they are not allowed to hand over their badge because it would compromise their security.
Sounds to me like NSTAC ought to be worried about a scheme to accredit co-lo operator security staff, as well as the visiting telco engineers.
-- Roland Perry
Current thread:
- Re: Collocation Access, (continued)
- Re: Collocation Access Dominic J. Eidson (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 24)
- RE: Collocation Access Jamie Bowden (Oct 25)
- Re: Collocation Access Joseph S D Yao (Oct 24)
- RE: Collocation Access David Schwartz (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Joseph S D Yao (Oct 27)
- RE: Collocation Access John A. Kilpatrick (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access John A. Kilpatrick (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access J. Oquendo (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Marshall Eubanks (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Edward Lewis (Oct 23)
- Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access Sean Donelan (Oct 23)
- Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access bmanning (Oct 23)
- Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access Gadi Evron (Oct 24)
- Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access Mike Hughes (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access bmanning (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Joseph S D Yao (Oct 23)