nanog mailing list archives

Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access


From: bmanning () karoshi com
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 20:49:05 +0000


On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 04:39:30PM -0400, Sean Donelan wrote:


Is it enough of a problem, network operators would be interested in 
publishing some Practical Common Practices (I hesitate to call it a BCP)
collocation facilities could follow for some common access control 
scenarios? Tenent access, pre-screened carrier, unscreened vendor, etc.


  i can see the reg headline now...  ISPs and BOFH's now pushing PCP!


http://www.ncs.gov/nstac/reports/2005/Final%20TATF%20Report%2004-25-05.pdf

I wouldn't be surprised if most co-lo's don't actually have good reasons 
why they do some things, and if presented with a reasonable industry 
agreed practice, would adopt it.

        colo's live/die based on paying customers.  getting input from
        customers is not a bad idea.  tempering customer feedback w/
        legal and liability concerns is always a trick.

--bill


Current thread: