nanog mailing list archives
Re: Collocation Access
From: Roland Perry <lists () internetpolicyagency com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 18:57:07 +0100
In article <20061023103731.W56322 () iama hypergeek net>, John A. Kilpatrick <john () hypergeek net> writes
The fellow I chatted with at AT&T said they are not allowed to hand over their badge because it would compromise their security.My tech said the same thing. That keycard could grant central office access
On its own? No keycode or anything. What if he lost it?
so he couldn't surrender it.
But presumably it would need to be stolen. Wouldn't the tech notice that happening... Or is there some way the colo security guy can clone it undetected?
-- Roland Perry
Current thread:
- Re: Collocation Access, (continued)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Abley (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access John A. Kilpatrick (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Sean Donelan (Oct 23)
- Did Cogent & L3 de-peer again? chuck goolsbee (Oct 23)
- Re: Did Cogent & L3 de-peer again? Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Alex Rubenstein (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Etaoin Shrdlu (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Craig Holland (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access John A. Kilpatrick (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access John A. Kilpatrick (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Warren Kumari (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Stasiniewicz, Adam (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Henry Yen (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Etaoin Shrdlu (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Jim Popovitch (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access David Schwartz (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Daniel Senie (Oct 23)
- RE: Collocation Access Randy Epstein (Oct 24)
- RE: Collocation Access Michael . Dillon (Oct 24)