nanog mailing list archives
Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:39:30 -0400 (EDT)
Is it enough of a problem, network operators would be interested in publishing some Practical Common Practices (I hesitate to call it a BCP) collocation facilities could follow for some common access control scenarios? Tenent access, pre-screened carrier, unscreened vendor, etc.
http://www.ncs.gov/nstac/reports/2005/Final%20TATF%20Report%2004-25-05.pdfI wouldn't be surprised if most co-lo's don't actually have good reasons why they do some things, and if presented with a reasonable industry agreed practice, would adopt it.
Current thread:
- RE: Collocation Access, (continued)
- RE: Collocation Access David Schwartz (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Joseph S D Yao (Oct 27)
- RE: Collocation Access John A. Kilpatrick (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Steven M. Bellovin (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access John A. Kilpatrick (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Roland Perry (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access J. Oquendo (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Marshall Eubanks (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Edward Lewis (Oct 23)
- Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access Sean Donelan (Oct 23)
- Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access bmanning (Oct 23)
- Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access Gadi Evron (Oct 24)
- Re: Practical Common Practice for Collocation Access Mike Hughes (Oct 24)
- Re: Collocation Access Joe Maimon (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access bmanning (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Joseph S D Yao (Oct 23)
- Re: Collocation Access Mike Hughes (Oct 24)
- RE: Collocation Access John Curran (Oct 23)