nanog mailing list archives
Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance
From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com>
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 15:07:13 -0400
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 01:58:07PM -0800, David Barak wrote:
--- "Jay R. Ashworth" <jra () baylink com> wrote:Actually, and I think the distinction is pertinent to this discussion, if the car has no seatbelts, you can drive it just fine -- as long as it came that way. You can't *sell* a car without seatbelts, anymore.That may be the rule in Florida, but in DC, MD, and UT (the states in which I've lived in the past 2 decades), you can be be ticketed if you are driving a car and not wearing a seatbelt.
I'd have to check, but I believe the exemption for cars not originally equipped in in the Federal Uniform Model Traffic Statues, which I think the majority of states have adopted, at least in substantial part, though IANAL. Nope: Maryland makes the exception: http://mlis.state.md.us/cgi-win/web_statutes.exe?gtr&22-412.3 If it wasn't manufactured with belts, you're not required to install them, but if they're there, you do have to wear them. I rather suspect the other jursidictions are similar.
To make this a little bit more relevant to our VoIP/911 discussion, would we allow a startup car company to sell something which looked like a seatbelt, but was not crash rated above 5 mph? No, of course we wouldn't. Would that be anticompetitive? No, it just means that to be a startup car company, you have to meet the same safety standards as the existing car companies.
Indeed.
If we want to take the analogy away from something which is a direct safety issue, the exact same argument applies to emissions standards. They're "standard" for a reason: they apply to everyone, and every car maker must comply. (SUVs are classified as trucks, and comply with the truck rules).
Actually, I believe most SUV's are *not* classified as light trucks, with the exceptions of the Excursion and Hummer.
Why would these arguments not apply to VoIP?
At this point, of course, I've lost track of what the argument is, in the delightful littls side trips. :-) <pinch> Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth jra () baylink com Designer Baylink RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates The Things I Think '87 e24 St Petersburg FL USA http://baylink.pitas.com +1 727 647 1274 If you can read this... thank a system administrator. Or two. --me
Current thread:
- RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance, (continued)
- RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Alexander Kiwerski (Apr 01)
- RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Alex Bligh (Apr 01)
- RE: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Stephen Sprunk (Apr 01)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 01)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance David Barak (Apr 01)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Kevin Oberman (Apr 01)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Kevin Oberman (Apr 01)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Owen DeLong (Apr 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 03)
- Re: Vonage Hits ISP Resistance Kevin Oberman (Apr 01)