Re: Cisco HFR

[Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>]

> > I've heard the rumor that that would be the first port that they would
> > undertake, and that would make some sense.  However, I hope that they
> > focus their efforts on stabilizing first and porting second.  No point
> > in porting what isn't stable.
> I thought the main reason for "in service upgrades" was to allow daily 
> updates to the code instead of the now popular bi-weekly ones. :-)

Oh my god. I am picturing CSR-1 "Auto Update" (ala Windows Update).

I think I haven't been this scared in a month.

Deepak