nanog mailing list archives
RE: Cisco HFR
From: Ryan Dobrynski <ryan () viaccess net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:26:47 -0400 (AST)
Because the suits (atleast the ones here) wont buy anything, unless they have seen an ad for it on cnn that promises it will tie thier socks for them. On Wed, 26 May 2004, Williams, Jeff wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 12:55:47 -0600 From: "Williams, Jeff" <jwilliams3 () tiaa-cref org> To: "'nanog () merit edu'" <nanog () merit edu> Subject: RE: Cisco HFR Peter Galbavy wrote:Today's Financial Times in the UK carried a mutli-page (1/3rd or so of each broadsheet page) series of ads for this platform. Ergh, the worst fluffy "now you can do this" marketing I have seen in quite a while. When will they learn that "bigger, faster, harder" is difficult to PR... PeterGiven the performance of this box isn't it a bit silly to mass market advertise it? At a guess there are only a few dozen companies worldwide that might need such a machine- so why not go direct to them? Or is this a case of 'brand awareness'? Is it really that important that the population at large thinks that Cisco gear is at the core of the Internet? Are end-users supposed to call their ISP and demand they use Cisco 'cause they saw a commercial for them? Just curious... I like their gear, just not their marketing. Jeff ************************************************************** This message, including any attachments, contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies. You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. TIAA-CREF **************************************************************
Ryan Dobrynski Hat-Swapping Gnome Choice Communications Like the ski resort of girls looking for husbands and husbands looking for girls, the situation is not as symmetrical as it might seem.
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco HFR, (continued)
- Re: Cisco HFR Peter Lothberg (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Peter Lothberg (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Henry Linneweh (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mikael Abrahamsson (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Hannigan, Martin (May 25)
- RE: Cisco HFR Tomas Daniska (May 26)
- RE: Cisco HFR Williams, Jeff (May 26)
- RE: Cisco HFR Herman Harless (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- RE: Cisco HFR Ryan Dobrynski (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Michel Py (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Neil J. McRae (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mans Nilsson (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Neil J. McRae (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Hank Nussbacher (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Peter Lothberg (May 25)