nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco HFR
From: Tony Li <tony.li () tony li>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 23:41:06 -0700
Agreed. I am surprised that noone else have brought that up. I understand that the software is built in a way that might not make sense to port to all Cisco platforms, but it would be nice to have on at least the GSRs.
I've heard the rumor that that would be the first port that they would undertake, and that would make some sense. However, I hope that they focus their efforts on stabilizing first and porting second. No point in porting what isn't stable. Tony
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco HFR, (continued)
- Re: Cisco HFR Steven M. Bellovin (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Jared Mauch (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Adrian Chadd (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Alexei Roudnev (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Robert E. Seastrom (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Steven M. Bellovin (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Kurt Erik Lindqvist (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Tony Li (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Deepak Jain (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Neil J. McRae (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Kevin Oberman (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mans Nilsson (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Warren Kumari (May 26)