nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco HFR
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch () muada com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 10:31:39 +0200
On 27-mei-04, at 10:19, Petri Helenius wrote:
I thought the main reason for "in service upgrades" was to allow daily updates to the code instead of the now popular bi-weekly ones. :-)
Now if only they can figure out how to get in the bug fixes every night but limit the introduction of new bugs to once every two weeks, we have a winner...
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco HFR, (continued)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Adrian Chadd (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Alexei Roudnev (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Robert E. Seastrom (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Kurt Erik Lindqvist (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Tony Li (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Deepak Jain (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Neil J. McRae (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Kevin Oberman (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mans Nilsson (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Warren Kumari (May 26)