nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cisco HFR


From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 19:56:34 +0200


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

In the old days, every major provider would already be talking about 
how
they have ordered 200 of these for every major market for redundant
deployment -- and are just waiting on Cisco to deliver them the gear.


Personally, I'm at least as intrigued by the IOS replacement as by the
high-speed hardware -- when will that percolate to the rest of the
product line?  As with any major new software product, it will probably
be less reliable at first, but -- given the design goals -- quite
likely much more reliable in the not tremendously distant future.

Agreed. I am surprised that noone else have brought that up. I 
understand that the software is built in a way that might not make 
sense to port to all Cisco platforms, but it would be nice to have on 
at least the GSRs.

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3

iQA/AwUBQLTaVqarNKXTPFCVEQInBgCg9b5JTL6uLlYbk3roOixLk6eI3FQAn2pW
7H3YMGyeIqeZz0b55P2T/8v0
=ogBj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: