Re: Was the ClimateGate Hacker Justified? Join the Debate!

[Martin Tomasek <tomasek () ufe cz>]

Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
> http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=359423
>   

Graph at the end of page reminded me of this report from 
surfacestations.org:
http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/surfacestationsreport_spring09.pdf

> Of course, it's exactly these sort of corrections to the data that have the
> climate-change deniers jumping up and down yelling 'ZOMG! Cooked Data!', and
> why many of the scientists advocated not releasing the raw uncorrected data.
>   

If I'm calculating it properly, it means that NOAA increased corrections 
through 20th century, so they got to +0.25C correction of raw data in 
2000. As far as I remember, they calculated linear trend of about 0.6C, 
so it seems like this scientists are causing about half of global 
temperature rise.. ;-)

-- 
Martin Tomasek


_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.