funsec mailing list archives
it isn't a 0day Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor
From: Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 06:24:32 -0600 (CST)
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Juha-Matti Laurio wrote:
The current result of VirusTotal scan of Word 0-day PoC file 12122006-djtest.doc is extremely poor. One AV vendor of 29 has a protection available.
It is disclosed in full-disclosure mode, in a discussion list.
This Proof of Concept file was publicly released on Tuesday 12th December and link to the release was posted to widely known security mailing list. More at http://blogs.securiteam.com/?p=763 - Juha-Matti _______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
_______________________________________________ Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts. https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.
Current thread:
- Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Juha-Matti Laurio (Dec 13)
- it isn't a 0day Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Gadi Evron (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Juha-Matti Laurio (Dec 13)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Gadi Evron (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Gadi Evron (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Brian Loe (Dec 14)
- Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor Gadi Evron (Dec 14)