Re: Anti-virus coverage of 12122006-djtest.doc Word PoC extremely poor

[Gadi Evron <ge () linuxbox org>]

On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Juha-Matti Laurio wrote:
> This has been confirmed as totally new, third zero-day vulnerability in Word, which is the reason of missing 
> protection with the most recent McAfee DATs etc.
> Related SecuriTeam entry has been updated.

Okay, but let's try to call not call it a 0day.

> - Juha-Matti
>
> Juha-Matti Laurio <juha-matti.laurio () netti fi> wrote: 
> > The current result of VirusTotal scan of Word 0-day PoC file 12122006-djtest.doc is extremely poor.
> > One AV vendor of 29 has a protection available.
> >
> > This Proof of Concept file was publicly released on Tuesday 12th December and link to the release was posted to 
> > widely known security mailing list.
> >
> > More at
> > http://blogs.securiteam.com/?p=763
> >
> > - Juha-Matti
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
> https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
> Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.

_______________________________________________
Fun and Misc security discussion for OT posts.
https://linuxbox.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/funsec
Note: funsec is a public and open mailing list.