Re: hushmail.com, is this true?

[Pseudo Nym <temp739 () yahoo com>]

This is from an earlier e-mail I drafted but did not
send:
"ah hah, I made another mistake.  I meant Etaoin
instead of Atte in my last e-mail.  Thank you Etaoin,
I'm VERY glad to here that you know people who do or
who have worked there.  That's very comforting.

Anyone else got anything?"

and again, Valdis is correct.  Hushmail isn't claiming
they won't hand over their logs, they're claiming they
aren't *making* them, rendering their logs useless if
seized through a court order.  That is a fairly
substantial claim for a free e-mail service which is
why I'm investigating it.


--- Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:

> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:51:07 MST, james edwards
> said:
>
> > No business can ignore a judges orders to produce
> whatever required
> > information.
> > The business can contest the request but if it is
> proven out the information
> > must be produced.
>
> So tell me - what do you do when you get served a
> subpoena requesting all
> your records regarding the development of a
> specified drug by Pfeizer?
>
> Oh. You never *had* those records, because you don't
> keep them?  I see.... ;)
>
> They can't force you to produce information you can
> prove you don't have...


                
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. 
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html