Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant
From: jseymour () linxnet com (Jim Seymour)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:51:11 -0500 (EST)
Brian Loe <knobdy () gmail com> wrote:
I still have to ask why everyone is an admin on their local machine,
We have product developers that develop product that runs on those boxes. We have traveling users, running laptops, and certain aspects of MS malware require Administrator rights in order to make those laptops usable.
but beyond that I'm also wondering why you would spend the extra time and money on an IRC client/environment at all. If the communications are to be kept within the company, MS provides free software to do that and you don't have to open it up to the 'Net. Here they install Messenger on every system. You're not allowed off-network and can only add users from AD.
These are extra-corporate communications being requested. Not *everybody* is on a 'doze box. We don't use AD. I cannot imagine why anybody would necessarily trust MS's software over any others, anyway.
If you do need to include folks from off the network then why not use one of the new whiz-bang web sites? Every vendor I've dealt with in the last couple of years has either installed their own or has rented time from a third-party.
These aren't vendor-customer communications being requested.
IRC isn't all that efficient at sharing ideas anyway - can't see how anyone could make a business case for it.
Your opinion. I happen to disagree. I'm personally on (counts...) six IRC channels on two IRC networks even as I type this. Three are "admin" type networks which result in *lots* of idea sharing and have been invaluable to me. The other three are open source project channels, all three of which have sometimes provided *instant* answers, and something email, Usenet news and web-based "boards" cannot: Interactive (group) problem analysis and resolution. Kind of wandering a bit far afield for this forum, aren't we? Regards, Jim -- Note: My mail server employs *very* aggressive anti-spam filtering. If you reply to this email and your email is rejected, please accept my apologies and let me know via my web form at <http://jimsun.linxnet.com/scform.php>. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- RE: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Paul Melson (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant ArkanoiD (Feb 01)
- RE: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Luke Butcher (Feb 01)
- RE: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Paul Melson (Feb 01)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Brian Loe (Feb 02)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Paul D. Robertson (Feb 02)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant ArkanoiD (Feb 02)
- RE: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Paul Melson (Feb 02)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Brian Loe (Feb 02)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Jim Seymour (Feb 02)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Brian Loe (Feb 02)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Brian Loe (Feb 01)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Rajeev Gupta (Feb 02)
- Message not available
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant Marcus J. Ranum (Feb 02)
- Re: "firewalls are obsolete" rant ArkanoiD (Feb 02)
- Message not available