Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: Statistics for Firewalls
From: Christopher Hicks <chicks () chicks net>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:16:50 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002, John Adams wrote:
Ahh, I suppose MRTG didn't work out for you, then? It's a much better tool for the job, but I bet you've already been told that. :)
Generally I've been quite irritated with the unusability of MRTG and the illegibility of the underlying code. I would rather hand code each and every snmp probe than fight with getting mrtg to cooperate. The stuff people are doing with rrdtool looks far better, but I haven't gotten to play with any of that yet. -- </chris> Camels may be nasty beasts, but they're the only way to get through the desert. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Re: Statistics for Firewalls, (continued)
- Re: Statistics for Firewalls Volker Tanger (Sep 10)
- Re: Statistics for Firewalls Joe Matusiewicz (Sep 10)
- Re: Statistics for Firewalls S. Jonah Pressman (Sep 10)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls Noonan, Wesley (Sep 10)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls Christopher Hicks (Sep 10)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls Bill Royds (Sep 10)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls Joe Matusiewicz (Sep 11)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls John Adams (Sep 11)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls Joe Matusiewicz (Sep 11)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls John Adams (Sep 11)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls Christopher Hicks (Sep 11)
- Re: Statistics for Firewalls IT - Sven Mueller (Sep 12)
- RE: Statistics for Firewalls Christopher Hicks (Sep 10)
- Re: Statistics for Firewalls Dominik Miklaszewski (Sep 10)