Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: FW-1 throughput question
From: Darren Reed <darrenr () reed wattle id au>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 18:54:31 +1000 (EST)
In some email I received from Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy, sie wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 11:38:35PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:Hmmm. What makes you believe it is single threaded ?According to what I know, the kernel module does not take advantage of multiple processors.
This is for FW-1 then ? If so, then that's another reason to can FW-1 and use IP Filter instead :-)
I don't know if that means it's single threaded or not, but take it for what it's worth. The Security Server processes *do* take advantage of multiple processors (have since 4.0).
Err, what are you talking here - NT or Solaris ? Darren
Current thread:
- FW-1 throughput question Randy Garbrick (May 05)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Aaron Turner (May 12)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 15)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Aaron Turner (May 19)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Ryan Russell (May 19)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Shaun Moran (May 21)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 15)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Aaron Turner (May 12)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Aaron Turner (May 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Alex Goldney (May 12)