Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: FW-1 throughput question
From: "Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy" <dwelch () phoneboy com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2000 22:57:31 -0700
On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 11:38:35PM +1000, Darren Reed wrote:
Hmmm. What makes you believe it is single threaded ?
According to what I know, the kernel module does not take advantage of multiple processors. I don't know if that means it's single threaded or not, but take it for what it's worth. The Security Server processes *do* take advantage of multiple processors (have since 4.0). -- Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy a.k.a. PhoneBoy dwelch () phoneboy com http://www.phoneboy.com The views expressed herein are not necessarily those of anyone else.
Current thread:
- FW-1 throughput question Randy Garbrick (May 05)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Aaron Turner (May 12)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 15)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 17)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Aaron Turner (May 19)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Ryan Russell (May 19)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Shaun Moran (May 21)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Darren Reed (May 15)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Aaron Turner (May 12)
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Aaron Turner (May 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: FW-1 throughput question Alex Goldney (May 12)