Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Say it ain't so
From: Rick Murphy <rick () paimail com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 22:20:59 -0400
At 12:43 PM 9/17/97 EST5EDT, Jim Leo wrote:
I feel that it should be possible to 'plug-in' any properly configured firewall (with the exception of the proxies) and not have to reconfigure machines. Am I wrong?
Possibly. If you're using somebody else's IP addresses on your network, you need a firewall that supports NAT to avoid readdressing. Otherwise, there's usually no reason to re-address inside hosts. As long as you have the network address range and a reasonable firewall, you shouldn't have to re-address anything. -Rick
Current thread:
- Say it ain't so Jim Leo (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Erik Van Riper (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Neil Ratzlaff (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Colin Campbell (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Paul D. Robertson (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Rick Murphy (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it ain't so Paul D. Robertson (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it ain't so Carl Friedberg, carl () comets com (Sep 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Say it ain't so jim (Sep 18)
- RE: Say it ain't so Giesinger, Nick HE0 (Sep 18)
- Re: Say it ain't so Sandeep_Talwar (Sep 18)
- RE: Say it ain't so Russ (Sep 19)
- Re: Say it Ain't So Jim Leo (Sep 19)