Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: RIAA Preservation Letter
From: Matthew Keller <kellermg () POTSDAM EDU>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 14:33:43 -0400
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 12:51 -0500, Dick Jacobson wrote:
Not so clear is if we should identify the individual and notify the individual that we received the notice.
We would, as a courtesy to our users.
One of the attorneys has suggested that the Preservation notice gives us knowledge of the activity and we should treat it the same as a Takedown notice.
I disagree. As others have said, the information in the p-note is insufficient evidence of any real violation. How many people have gotten p-notes and never heard anything after that about the alleged infractions? If your 'acceptable use policy' allows, you could, in theory, start watching traffic from said systems after a p-note is received, and possibly identify traffics which would then sufficiently allow you to start internal 'takedown' procedures, but that too is... dicey, and I wouldn't do or recommend it. -- Matthew Keller Information Security Officer & Network Administrator Computing & Technology Services State University of New York @ Potsdam Potsdam, NY, USA http://mattwork.potsdam.edu/
Current thread:
- RIAA Preservation Letter Dick Jacobson (May 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Theresa Semmens (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Mike Iglesias (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Sarah Stevens (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Tracy Mitrano (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Matthew Gracie (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Ken Connelly (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Matthew Keller (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter H. Morrow Long (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Howell, Paul (May 21)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Kathy Bergsma (May 21)