Educause Security Discussion mailing list archives
Re: RIAA Preservation Letter
From: Sarah Stevens <sarah () STEVENS-TECHNOLOGIES COM>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 11:07:40 -0700
I believe that there are also two sides to the story. What about the risk of the student not "knowing" that they are subject to adverse actions for not complying with these regulations? I believe that the University also has an obligation to notify the student of what information will be kept and how it will be kept. ________________________________ From: Theresa Semmens [mailto:theresa.semmens () NDSU EDU] Sent: Tue 5/15/2007 10:57 AM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: Re: [SECURITY] RIAA Preservation Letter How can we treat it as a "Take Down Notice," when we don't know what the copyright infringed media is? For "Take Down Notices," the infringed media is listed along with the p2p application that was used to share the media. In the preservation notice, we don't have any knowledge of what is being infringed. Futher more, if we go through the take down process, this involves removing copyright infringed materials from the offending computer. Won't this be against the preservation principle? Can we be liable for removing said "evidence?" Theresa Semmens, CISA NDSU IT Security Officer PO Box 5164 North Dakota State University Fargo, ND Phone: 701-231-5870 FAX: 701-231-8541 Theresa.Semmens () ndsu edu "Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work." Thomas Edison -----Original Message----- From: Dick Jacobson [mailto:Dick.Jacobson () NDSU NODAK EDU] Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2007 12:52 PM To: SECURITY () LISTSERV EDUCAUSE EDU Subject: [SECURITY] RIAA Preservation Letter This just does not want to go away. 8-0 I have been asked to put together a procedure for responding to the different notices from the copyright holders or their agents and to find out what others are doing. The discussions now are with the attorneys (plural). The Takedown notices and Pre-Litigation notices are not causing as much conversation as the Preservation notice. First, it is understood that we are under no obligation with regard to these notices and will not alter our log retention practices from our stated policy in order to accomodate the notice. Not so clear is if we should identify the individual and notify the individual that we received the notice. One of the attorneys has suggested that the Preservation notice gives us knowledge of the activity and we should treat it the same as a Takedown notice. I am interested in both your thoughts and your stated process for these. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Dick Jacobson e-mail : Dick.Jacobson () ndus NoDak edu NDUS IT Security Officer office : IACC 206, NDSU ND HECN MultiUser Host SysAdd phone : 701-231-7385 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- RIAA Preservation Letter Dick Jacobson (May 15)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Theresa Semmens (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Mike Iglesias (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Sarah Stevens (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Tracy Mitrano (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Matthew Gracie (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Ken Connelly (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Matthew Keller (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter H. Morrow Long (May 15)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Howell, Paul (May 21)
- Re: RIAA Preservation Letter Kathy Bergsma (May 21)