Wireshark mailing list archives

Re: Getting captured interface name inside plugin


From: Roland Knall <rknall () gmail com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 11:49:23 +0200

Also are you running the same protocol on all the different buses, or has
each bus its own distinctive protocol?

cheers
Roland

Am Mo., 7. Juni 2021 um 02:58 Uhr schrieb Guy Harris <gharris () sonic net>:

On Jun 6, 2021, at 5:41 PM, Jan Mall <jan.mall () uni-ulm de> wrote:

The ultimate goal is an automotive dissector, which takes abstract
network descriptions for automotive buses and dissects the messages on the
bus accordingly. But as every bus has a different set of message
definitions,

So is there a single LINKTYPE_ value for all those buses, or do they all
have different LINKTYPE_ values?

If so, what are the LINKTYPE_ values?
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org
?subject=unsubscribe

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev () wireshark org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe

Current thread: