Wireshark mailing list archives
Re: One NIC on public side
From: Martin Visser <martinvisser99 () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 16 May 2010 20:44:23 +1000
Using a hub that runs with ports at half-duplex and a having a PC with a port set at full-duplex *will* cause packet loss. A PC configured to full-duplex has collision detection disabled, so if a collision does occur, the PC will not know about it and not retransmit the lost frame. This used to be a common problem but is increasingly rarely seen in the wild (because of auth-negotiate being the default on switches, and gigabit NICs which are recommended to be configrued as auto). Regards, Martin MartinVisser99 () gmail com On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Richard Bejtlich <taosecurity () gmail com>wrote:
Hello, Using a hub does not cause packet loss due to collisions. Half duplex Ethernet was designed to deal with collisions. Sincerely, Richard On 5/13/10, Boonie <newsboonie () gmail com> wrote:So, disabling some of these protocols will allow me to safely connect it on the public side again then?Without IP, I do not see how these other protocols will reach another machine. But, just disable all of them. Are you sure you want tu run all traffic through a hub? This might leadtopacketloss due to colissions. Dave___________________________________________________________________________Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org ?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-users mailing list <wireshark-users () wireshark org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-users Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-users mailto:wireshark-users-request () wireshark org?subject=unsubscribe
Current thread:
- Re: One NIC on public side, (continued)
- Re: One NIC on public side Boonie (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Boonie (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 13)
- Re: One NIC on public side Kevin Cullimore (May 15)
- Re: One NIC on public side Richard Bejtlich (May 15)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 15)
- Re: One NIC on public side Boonie (May 16)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 19)
- Re: One NIC on public side Martin Visser (May 16)
- Re: One NIC on public side Richard Bejtlich (May 17)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 19)
- Re: One NIC on public side Marc Luethi (May 19)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 19)
- Re: One NIC on public side mike () grounded net (May 19)